
By: Connie Sychowski
© September 2003
Part1
This is a good question. All over the Internet you can find websites selling the family crest or coat of arms for your surname. I found it interesting that on all the different websites I visited I could use any number of surnames and come up with almost identical symbols and meanings. How can this be true, if our lineage differ in so many ways? In my opinion these websites are selling false or novelty information that has no bearing on historical facts.
Background
A system of hereditary identification (Heraldry) uses a visual or pictorial symbol called coats of arms, or armorial bearings. Originally in times of the medieval knight this consisted of a shield with devices displayed upon it. It became common practice that the same emblem was displayed on the knights surcoat, the tunic that was worn over his armor; this gave rise to the expression coat of arms.
These symbols became increasingly elaborate and finally spread beyond the use of the military. So the study of heraldry covers the origin, development, and significance of coats of arms and the official regulation of their use by individuals, families, political units, and social organizations.
Origin
In primitive societies where the majority of the population was illiterate the symbols were commonly used for identification. In medieval Europe, however, such emblematic identification became a highly complicated science, the roots of which predate AD 1000. According to the encyclopedia there is evidence that the Vikings used a galley in full sail as an emblem, and many of the Scottish clans, or tribes, used the device of the lion. The horse was a symbol found among both the AngloSaxons and the Saxons of Germany, whereas the eagle, which is associated with Charlemagne, became a widespread symbol in Germany. All these emblems predate formal heraldry, but they later passed into heraldic use.
Beginning with the 12th century, the coat of arms began to appear and was adopted rapidly throughout Western Europe. The faces of the iron clad warriors or knights were covered by helmets, so symbols were developed because of the need to identify them. Many of the crusades contained a vast number of different nationalities. The majority of the nobles could not write so the idea of heraldic identification spread quickly among the nobility of Western Europe. They incorporated coats of arms into the design of the wax seals with which they stamped letters and documents. Before long coats of arms were adopted for the same purpose by clerics, lawyers, and the heads of corporations such as colleges, merchant companies, and towns. Though heraldry began with the nobles, in many countries, it came to be used by the burghers, giving rise to non-noble arms. In the cities of Italy and in the Alpine regions, patricians who were accorded equal status with the landed nobility, although not descended from them also adopted the use of heraldry.
What is the history of a “Family Crest?”
By: Connie Sychowski
© September 2003
Part 2
Basic Description
Heraldry became systematized early in its history and developed a specialized vocabulary called blazon to describe the devices used. In the British Isles the vocabulary of blazon was derived from Norman French with much borrowing from other languages.
For descriptive purposes the shield-shaped field, or ground, of the coat of arms is divided into nine areas. The three at the top are called (from viewer's left to right) dexter chief, center chief, and sinister chief; those in the horizontal center, dexter flank, fess point, and sinister flank; and those at the bottom, dexter base, center base, and sinister base. The designations "dexter" (Latin: "right") and "sinister" (Latin: "left") are given from the point of view of the warrior behind the shield.
The colors, or tinctures, of the field are limited to two metals, gold (or) and silver (argent); five, or sometimes seven, colors, red (gules), blue (azure), black (sable), green (vert), purple (purpure), and sometimes sanguine (murrey) and tawny (tenne); and various furs, such as ermine (appearing in stylized form as black tails on a white field) and vair (squirrel; bell shapes of alternating blue and white). Later a system of lines and dots was adopted in order to show the tinctures in black and white illustrations.
Superimposed on the field are the charges. The most common charges are called ordinaries, basic geometric bands of color such as the fess (a horizontal band across the central third of the field), the chief (a band across the top), the pale (a vertical band down the central third), the bend (a wide diagonal band), the bar (a horizontal band one-fifth the depth of the shield), and the chevron (an inverted V). Also called ordinaries--or by some experts, subordinaries--are such less-common shapes as the cross, the saltire (a diagonal cross), the pile (a triangular wedge from the top), the billet (a small rectangle), the bordure (a narrow border), the orle (a border set in from the edge), and the inescutcheon (an inner shieldlike shape), among many others. Many of these charges appear in multiple and diminutive form, in which case they are called barry, bendy, paly, or by the appropriate plural form.
In addition to the ordinaries are a myriad of other charges that depict both animate and inanimate objects. Animals such as lions, eagles, dolphins, and boars appear in profusion and with many different attitudes. Mythical animals (for example, the dragon and griffin), trees and flowers, ships, and weapons are also common.
Division of the field is accomplished by partition lines that often follow the lines of the ordinaries and are called accordingly per pale, per bend, and per saltire, for example. The sections thus formed are of different color, and charges may change color on either side of the line, thus becoming counterchanged.
The partition lines need not be straight; variations include indented, wavy, engrailed, invected, embattled, and nebule lines.
The process by which arms are combined to show matrimonial and other alliances is called marshaling. Marriage is usually shown by impalement, in which the shield is divided vertically, with the husband's arms in the dexter half and the wife's in the sinister. Their children might use both sets of arms on a quartered shield, with the arms repeated diagonally.
Cadency is the name given to the modifications made to differentiate various branches and members of a family entitled to bear the same coat of arms. There are two systems. Major brisures, which involve changes of charges or tinctures or the addition of ordinaries, indicate different branches of a family. They were used in Scotland and continental Europe, except Germany. In England, the use of major brisures was discontinued in the 15th century, when the Wars of the Roses virtually eliminated the old families. The English, therefore, came to use only minor brisures--small symbols added to designate the position of a member within the nuclear family. For example, the symbol of the first son is a label (a narrow strip with three pendants); that of the second, a crescent; that of the third, a mullet (five-pointed star); and that of the fourth, a martlet (mythical bird).
The Armorial Achievement
As time passed the armorial bearings began to include elements other than the shield. Helmets took varying shapes to indicate the rank of the warrior, and at the beginning of the 14th century English knights began to wear distinctive crests on their helmets. Although originally restricted to knights of tournament rank, crests soon became widespread and, in most heraldic jurisdictions, were granted with coats of arms. Originally these crests were borne directly on the helmet, but distinctions emerged. The crests of knights were borne on wreaths of the livery colors; magnates often had a crest coronet; and some (in Scotland, feudal barons) had their crests on a chapeau.
The helmet and crest were placed above the coat of arms in the complete grouping of elements, called the armorial achievement. Other elements added over the centuries were mottoes placed below and above the arms and crest; a compartment, some form of ground placed below the shield (in Scotland and France it had special significance); and supporters, usually in animal or human form, which flanked the shield and stood on the compartment. At an early date arms were also placed on flags.
Heraldic Authorities
Officers of arms were necessary to control heraldry, to see that arms were not duplicated or wrongfully assumed. These officers were called heralds and pursuivants. They supervised the medieval tournaments (displays of knightly combat) and the actual mustering of knights in war, for which they drew up the magnificent rolls of arms.
The heralds were eventually subsumed under national armorial administrations, some of which still exist. Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Switzerland, South Africa, Kenya, and New Zealand are among the monarchies and republics that have heraldic offices. The most famous such institutions are the English College of Arms and the Scottish Court of the Lord Lyon, where arms and pedigrees are recorded and new arms given to individuals and corporations. In addition, the Scottish Lord Lyon King of Arms retains judicial functions, adjudicating on the rights to use arms and titles.
References:
Robert Gayre of Gayre and Nigg
Bibliography: Brooke-Little, J. P., Boutell's Heraldry, rev. ed. (1978); Dennys, R., Heraldry and the Heralds (1982); Franklyn, Julian, Shield and Crest, 3d ed. (1963); Friar, S., ed., The Dictionary of Heraldry (1987); Gayre of Gayre and Nigg, Robert, Heraldic Standards (1959), Heraldic Cadency (1961), and The Nature of Arms (1961); Innes of Learney, Sir Thomas, Scots Heraldry, 2d ed. (1956; repr. 1971); Neubecker, Ottfried, Heraldry (1976); Preble, George H., The Symbols, Standards, Flags, and Banners of Ancient and Modern Nations (1980); Puttock, A.G., A Dictionary of Heraldry and Related Subjects (1970; repr. 1986); Woodcock, T., and Robinson, T., and Robinson, J., The Oxford Guide to Heraldry (1989).
Published in U S Legacies Magazine March and April 2004
- Log in to post comments